Lambeth leaseholders overcharged by council
Errors in service charge calculations and non-functional systems led to significant financial burdens for residents.
Incident → evidence → outcomeLeaseholders in Lambeth have been subjected to significant overcharging by Lambeth Council, with errors in service charge calculations leading to residents being billed for areas substantially larger than actual grounds, and for systems that do not work. A leaseholder told a council meeting that a report on the Homeownership Service and Leaseholder Experience did not fully reflect these issues.
Errors in Service Charge Calculations
Tracey Gregory, a leaseholder, informed members of Lambeth Council's Housing Scrutiny Sub-Committee on Wednesday, September 30, that the council's report lacked detail on the serious impacts of errors in service charge administration. She cited a specific instance where leaseholders on one estate were charged for maintaining 10,000 square metres of grounds, when the actual area was only 1,400 square metres. This meant they were billed for an area seven times larger than reality, as reported by MyLondon.
Ms Gregory also highlighted that leaseholders had been charged over £100,000 for a door entry system that was not functional. She stated that such errors are being replicated across the borough, attributing them partly to deficiencies in systems for cost assessment and allocation by departments such as estate management and capital works. She told the committee that improving leaseholder services alone would not be sufficient to resolve these fundamental problems.
Council Response and Next Steps
Antony Wynne, representing the Lambeth Homeowners' Association, told the sub-committee that minor changes to services would not address the core issues of contract management. He noted that the extent of wasted money only became apparent when leaseholders challenged what he described as 'spectacular overcharging' and charges for work not done or not needed. He added that the council has had to refund leaseholders, but the association has not received answers regarding any recoupment from contractors.
Following the discussion, the Housing Scrutiny Sub-Committee agreed to establish a working group. This group will comprise three leaseholders and three committee members to address the concerns raised. The committee also recommended recognising the Lambeth Homeowners' Association as a representative body for leaseholders, subject to necessary governance arrangements.
Questions this report answers
01What kind of overcharging have Lambeth leaseholders experienced?
Leaseholders have been overcharged due to errors in service charge calculations, including being billed for grounds maintenance seven times larger than the actual area. They were also charged over £100,000 for a door entry system that did not function, according to a leaseholder's testimony.
02What is Lambeth Council doing about these issues?
Lambeth Council's Housing Scrutiny Sub-Committee has agreed to form a working group to address leaseholder concerns. This group will consist of three leaseholders and three committee members to investigate and propose solutions.
03Will the Lambeth Homeowners' Association be officially recognised?
Yes, the Housing Scrutiny Sub-Committee has recommended that the Lambeth Homeowners' Association be recognised as a representative body for leaseholders. This recognition is subject to the necessary governance arrangements being put in place.
Support is available without a police report
Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.
Find victim supportSend a correction or case update
If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.
Contact the desk