Driver wins A20 speeding appeal over conflicting signs
Kingston Crown Court quashed John Abbott's fine, citing issues with temporary speed limit enforcement.
Incident → evidence → outcomeA motorist has become the first to successfully appeal a speeding conviction on the A20 in Sidcup, south-east London. The appeal was based on conflicting speed limit signs that affected drivers between October 2023 and October 2024.
John Abbott had his fine quashed at Kingston Crown Court last month. The court's decision followed the enforcement of a temporary 40mph speed limit on the Kent-bound section of the A20, introduced due to flooding concerns. During this period, a 50mph sign remained visible, leading to numerous motorists receiving fines.
Driver's Experience and Campaigner Response
Mr Abbott expressed his satisfaction, stating he was pleased not only for himself but also for the thousands of drivers fined in similar circumstances. He described the penalties as a "massive injustice" that had significantly impacted drivers' daily lives, leading to increased insurance costs and difficulties in commuting and earning a living. His legal success has provided encouragement to those campaigning against the fines.
“What I want to know is what Sadiq Khan is going to do to notify the thousands and thousands of people who have got these speeding tickets incorrectly.”
Laura Trott, a Member of Parliament involved in the campaign against the fines, questioned Mayor of London Sadiq Khan on how affected drivers would be notified. Ms Trott highlighted the severe consequences faced by drivers, including increased insurance premiums and job losses, attributing these issues to incorrect enforcement.
Transport for London's Position
Transport for London (TfL) defended the introduction of the 40mph speed limit, stating it was a necessary measure in response to flooding incidents that posed a risk to life. A TfL spokesperson confirmed that the speed limit was returned to 50mph after road repairs and resurfacing. The organisation stated it remained confident that the enforcement was necessary for safety reasons and that it would contest appeals challenging their actions.
John Dunlop, a member of the A20 Alliance, a group formed to contest the speed enforcement, welcomed the ruling on Mr Abbott's fine. He called for an independent investigation into how TfL managed the situation.
The mayor of London's office has been approached for comment on the matter.
Questions this report answers
01Why was a driver's speeding conviction on the A20 overturned?
John Abbott successfully appealed his A20 speeding conviction at Kingston Crown Court because of conflicting speed limit signs. A temporary 40mph limit was in place due to flooding, but a 50mph sign remained, leading to the appeal being upheld.
02What was Transport for London's reason for the temporary speed limit?
Transport for London stated that the temporary 40mph speed limit on the A20 in Sidcup was introduced in response to flooding incidents that presented a risk to life. The limit was returned to 50mph after the road was repaired and resurfaced.
03What are campaigners calling for regarding the A20 speed enforcement?
The A20 Alliance, a motorist campaign group, is calling for an independent investigation into Transport for London's handling of the A20 speed enforcement. They believe the situation has caused significant hardship for many drivers.
Support is available without a police report
Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.
Find victim supportSend a correction or case update
If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.
Contact the deskContinue the investigation
CourtsFour jailed for serious crimes across South London
CourtsBexley Magician Jailed for Child Abuse and Indecent Images
CourtsPalantir and Mayor Khan end Met police AI contract dispute