Duke of Sussex accuses security body chair of withholding al Qaida threat information
Prince Harry has written to the Home Secretary requesting her personal involvement in his family's police protection.
Incident → evidence → outcomeThe Duke of Sussex has accused the chair of the Royal and Public Figures Protection Executive Committee (Ravec) of failing to relay information about an al Qaida threat made in 2023. Harry's legal team is understood to have alleged that the Ravec chair was aware of the threat but did not pass details to his security staff or to authorities in the United States, where he was residing at the time. Ravec is the body responsible for authorising protection for senior royals and includes representatives from the Home Office, the Metropolitan Police, and the Royal Household.
In a letter sent this month to Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Harry requested her personal intervention in determining whether his family should receive close police protection. The Duke believes his family faces an 'international threat'. This development follows his return to the UK with his wife and children for an extended stay.
Intelligence and previous security challenges
Intelligence concerning an al Qaida document that referenced the 'assassination' of Prince Harry was shared with the FBI through the Five Eyes intelligence alliance in late 2023. This alliance comprises Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and the US. Reports indicate that since 2007, there have been at least six threats or plots against the Duke from the Taliban, al Qaida, or their supporters.
Harry previously lost a legal battle against the Home Office regarding security arrangements for himself and his family in the UK. This case concerned the level of protection provided after he ceased to be a working royal. In written submissions during his appeal, it was stated that Ravec ruled in 2020 that there was 'no basis for publicly-funded security support for the duke and duchess within Great Britain'.
Following this decision, al Qaida reportedly called for Harry 'to be murdered'. His security team was informed that the terrorist group had published a document stating his 'assassination would please the Muslim community', according to Shaheed Fatima KC, representing the Duke.
The Duke has previously stated that he faces a greater risk than his late mother, citing 'additional layers of racism and extremism'. A risk assessment, ordered by Ravec, is understood to have been completed at the end of July, but Harry reportedly does not know its outcome.
Questions this report answers
01What is Ravec?
Ravec, the Royal and Public Figures Protection Executive Committee, is the body responsible for authorising protection for senior royals and key public figures. It includes representation from the Home Office, the Metropolitan Police, and the Royal Household, and advises an independent chairperson.
02What threat has the Duke of Sussex accused Ravec of not disclosing?
The Duke of Sussex has accused the chair of Ravec of not passing on information about a 2023 threat from al Qaida. His legal team alleges the chair was aware of this threat but did not inform his security staff or US authorities.
03What was the outcome of Prince Harry's previous legal battle over security?
Prince Harry previously lost a legal battle against the Home Office concerning security arrangements after he stopped being a working royal. Ravec had ruled in 2020 that there was no basis for publicly-funded security support for him and his wife in Great Britain.
Support is available without a police report
Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.
Find victim supportSend a correction or case update
If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.
Contact the deskContinue the investigation
CourtsPrince Harry still angry, expects apology, lost security case
CourtsLouis Taylor jailed for 20 years for Gravesend rape and wounding
CourtsInfluencer denies role in £137k Mayfair watch robbery
CourtsBaby died after hospital monitor alarm set too low
CourtsJamie Carragher faces bankruptcy petition over £800,000 tax bill