Trending
Case fileCourtsHillingdon

Hillingdon Council faulted over disabled man's housing case

The local authority failed to properly assess evidence and make timely enquiries for an autistic man with mental health conditions.

Reporting desk London Crime News Desk||3 min read|London Crime News
London Borough of Hillingdon, Pembroke Road - geograph.org.uk - 5726528Incident → evidence → outcome
London Borough of Hillingdon, Pembroke Road - geograph.org.uk - 5726528Lewis Clarke via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Hillingdon Council wrongly instructed a disabled man that he had 24 hours to present a police report to support his claim that his accommodation was unsuitable, or his homelessness application would be closed. The man, who is autistic and lives with mental health conditions, is hypersensitive to noise. The council failed to make timely enquiries and properly assess all the evidence relating to how his housing situation affected him.

The case, detailed in a Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman report, involved a man referred to as Mr X. In 2021, the council accepted a duty of care after he presented as homeless and assisted him in finding a room in a house in multiple occupation (HMO) outside the borough. In late July 2025, Mr X submitted a homelessness application, stating that noise and anti-social behaviour from other occupants made it unreasonable for him to continue living there. He provided medical reports confirming his diagnoses and indicated a need for support with budgeting and benefits due to learning disabilities and mental health issues.

Council's actions criticised

In August 2025, Hillingdon Council requested Mr X provide a police report within 24 hours to demonstrate why he could no longer remain at the property. The council later acknowledged this demand was 'not strictly necessary' and that it should have conducted further enquiries itself before deciding on his application. The Ombudsman stated the council was at fault for not considering Mr X’s medical evidence promptly and for failing to properly assess all evidence alongside his housing circumstances. This led to a delay in processing his application and caused him uncertainty.

By September 2025, an NHS community-based mental health service issued a letter stating that Mr X’s HMO accommodation was 'wholly unsuitable'. The council apologised for the delay in handling his application, but the watchdog found the apology insufficient to remedy the uncertainty caused. The Ombudsman noted that the council had a duty to consider reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act, as it was aware of Mr X’s disabilities. The failure to offer appropriate assistance was deemed a fault that caused him 'avoidable distress'.

Resolution and future actions

In late October 2025, Hillingdon Council agreed to implement specific adjustments to support Mr X. These included communicating with him only in writing, avoiding phone contact, and providing assistance with uploading evidence to its housing portal. The council also offered to arrange an in-person meeting in a quiet room at Hillingdon Civic Centre. The local authority was directed to apologise to Mr X and make a symbolic payment of £100 for the distress caused.

The Ombudsman also recommended that the council remind staff through training or briefings of their duties when considering homelessness applications and the need to consider reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act. Hillingdon Council stated that it acknowledges the Ombudsman’s findings, has apologised to the individual, and agreed to the remedy. The council added that it has already implemented actions identified during the investigation, including process improvements and enhanced support for residents with additional needs.

Reader briefing

Questions this report answers

Q/A
01What was Hillingdon Council criticised for in this case?

Hillingdon Council was criticised for wrongly telling a disabled man he had only 24 hours to prove his home was unsuitable with a police report, or his homelessness application would be closed. The council also failed to make timely enquiries and properly assess evidence related to his autism and mental health conditions.

02What was the man's living situation?

The man, who is autistic and has mental health conditions, was living in a house in multiple occupation (HMO) outside the borough. He stated that noise and anti-social behaviour from other occupants made it unreasonable for him to continue living there.

03What adjustments has the council agreed to make?

Hillingdon Council has agreed to communicate with the man only in writing, avoid phone contact, and assist him with uploading evidence. They also offered an in-person meeting in a quiet room and made a symbolic payment of £100.

LC
Source-led case desk

London Crime News Desk

Source-led, editor-supervised

See the reporting protocol →
Help after crime

Support is available without a police report

Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.

Find victim support
Secure the detail

Send a correction or case update

If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.

Contact the desk

Continue the investigation

Who else reported this

Our article above is written from the facts in these reports. Read the originals — every one is linked.

The morning case file

London Crime Briefing

Significant incidents, hearings, outcomes and public-data changes across the capital.

Hillingdon Council faulted over disabled housing case | London Crime News