Palantir drops £50m Met Police AI deal legal challenge
Mayor's office confirms decision was based on value for money, not company ethics.
Technology firm Palantir has dropped its legal challenge against the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) concerning a £50 million contract with the Metropolitan Police. MOPAC confirmed on Wednesday that its decision to block the two-year software deal has not been reversed.
In a joint statement, MOPAC clarified that its decision was based on its legal obligation to scrutinise spending proposals and ensure value for money. The office stated the decision was not influenced by Palantir's values or ethics, and that the company is welcome to bid when the contract is re-tendered. Neither party has incurred payment to the other, and each will bear their own legal expenses.
Background to the dispute
MOPAC blocked the proposed contract for artificial intelligence tools, intended to automate intelligence analysis in criminal investigations, in May. The Metropolitan Police had sought MOPAC's approval for its procurement strategy, but deputy mayor for policing and crime, Kaya Comer-Schwartz, stated in a letter to the commissioner that the force had only seriously considered one supplier. This failure to seek MOPAC's approval was described as a 'clear and serious breach' of procurement rules.
Palantir filed a lawsuit in June, alleging that MOPAC had unlawfully vetoed the deal by wrongly considering the company's values and ethics. MOPAC denied these claims. The case was scheduled for trial in January, with London mayor Lord Sadiq Khan having agreed to provide access to his text messages and emails as part of the proceedings.
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley indicated in June that the force's process had been legally and commercially compliant. He warned that the non-renewal of such services could lead to cuts in staff and operational capacity. The Palantir system was projected to enable the Met to reduce its workforce by 500 employees, a measure considered in response to budget shortfalls of £100 million this year and £125 million next year. The force's budget for 2026-27 included plans for 1,150 job reductions, with the AI tools intended to handle the analytical work for 500 of those roles, speeding up intelligence reports and mobile phone analysis.
Sir Mark also noted that by March 2026, the Metropolitan Police had fewer officers per 100,000 residents than at any point since 1981.
Next steps
MOPAC is working with the Metropolitan Police to re-run the contract process promptly. The exact timeline for this re-tender and the final decision on the software contract remain to be confirmed.
Questions this report answers
01Why did Palantir drop its legal challenge?
Palantir withdrew its High Court challenge against the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) over the blocked £50 million contract. MOPAC stated that its decision was based on ensuring value for money and fulfilling its legal duty to examine spending proposals.
02Was the decision to block the deal based on Palantir's ethics?
No, MOPAC clarified that its decision was not based on Palantir's values or ethics. The office stated it does not have a policy against contracting with the firm and is happy to correct any impression that ethics were a factor.
03What was the Metropolitan Police planning to use the software for?
The Metropolitan Police intended to use Palantir's AI tools to automate intelligence analysis in criminal investigations. This included speeding up analysis of mobile phone data and potentially allowing for the automation of 500 jobs.
04What happens next with the contract?
MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police are working together to re-run the contract process with all due expediency. Palantir is free to bid again when the contract is re-tendered.
Support is available without a police report
Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.
Find victim supportSend a correction or case update
If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.
Contact the desk