Trending
Case fileCourtsWandsworth

Prisoner died by suicide after terror order impact, inquest finds

Jury concludes HMP Wandsworth failed to support Akhtar Uddin due to lack of awareness of TPIM restrictions.

Reporting desk London Crime News Desk||4 min read|London Crime News
HM Prison WandsworthIncident → evidence → outcome
HM Prison WandsworthRobin Webster via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

An inquest jury has concluded that prisoner Akhtar Uddin died by suicide after the imposition of Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (TPIM) had a substantial impact on his mental state. Mr Uddin, 35, died in HMP Wandsworth on Christmas Day 2021, having been jailed the previous year for breaching his TPIM order.

The jury at Inner West London Coroner's Court also found that the prison service failed to provide Mr Uddin with the necessary support. This failure was attributed to a lack of awareness among prison staff regarding the specific restrictions and potential psychological effects of TPIMs.

TPIM Restrictions and Mental State

TPIMs are measures used by the government to control individuals suspected of involvement in terrorism who cannot be prosecuted or deported. These can include electronic tagging, curfews, relocation, and restrictions on internet use, finances, and associations. Breaches can lead to imprisonment.

The inquest heard that Mr Uddin believed his TPIM was imposed due to reckless statements made under the influence of drugs, not terrorism. He had over 20 previous criminal convictions, none for terrorism offences. He breached his TPIM 12 times, primarily by withdrawing more money than permitted, which he largely spent on drugs, as reported by the BBC.

Jurors were satisfied that the imposition of the TPIM and its restrictive nature had a significant impact on Mr Uddin's mental state. They also found that the fear of a likely re-imposition of such measures, and their potentially never-ending nature, contributed to his distress in prison.

Failure to Provide Support

Evidence presented at the inquest indicated that prison services were unaware of the TPIM restrictions and their likely impact on Mr Uddin. A governor at HMP Wandsworth accepted that a lack of staff knowledge had resulted in "unintentionally cruel" treatment. Mr Uddin's sister, Jasmine, stated that counter-terrorism officers had questioned him in prison and suggested he would never be released from the TPIM.

Dr Richard Latham, a consultant forensic psychiatrist who appeared as an expert witness, concluded that Mr Uddin had an undiagnosed personality disorder and associated psychological vulnerabilities, leading to impulsiveness and paranoia. He noted that TPIMs are designed to create isolation, which can exacerbate psychological vulnerability and lead to emotional isolation.

Preventing Future Deaths Report

Coroner Bernard Richmond KC stated that he would be issuing a preventing future deaths report to the government. This is due to concerns about a potential risk to other individuals subjected to terrorism control measures, highlighting a paucity of support for those under TPIMs.

Mr Uddin's family, through their solicitors, welcomed the inquest's findings. They expressed hope that the outcome will lead to meaningful changes for individuals subject to the TPIM regime, stating that "nothing can bring back their loving son, brother and uncle."

A government spokesperson described TPIMs as a last resort for managing terrorist risks from individuals who cannot be prosecuted or deported, emphasising that they are carefully considered and strictly focused on preventing involvement in terrorist activity.

Reader briefing

Questions this report answers

Q/A
01What did the inquest jury conclude about Akhtar Uddin's death?

The inquest jury concluded that prisoner Akhtar Uddin died by suicide. They found that the imposition of Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (TPIM) had a substantial impact on his mental state and that HMP Wandsworth failed to provide adequate support due to staff's lack of awareness of TPIM restrictions.

02Why did the prison service fail to provide Akhtar Uddin with support?

The jury found that prison services were unaware of the specific restrictions and potential psychological effects of TPIMs. This lack of knowledge meant that support provided was not suitably targeted to Mr Uddin's specific needs and situation, leading to what a prison governor described as 'unintentionally cruel' treatment.

03What action will the coroner take following the inquest?

Coroner Bernard Richmond KC stated he will issue a report to the government regarding risks to others under terrorism control measures. This report will highlight concerns about the support available for individuals subjected to TPIMs and the potential risks they face.

LC
Source-led case desk

London Crime News Desk

Source-led, editor-supervised

See the reporting protocol →
Help after crime

Support is available without a police report

Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.

Find victim support
Secure the detail

Send a correction or case update

If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.

Contact the desk

Continue the investigation

Who else reported this

Our article above is written from the facts in these reports. Read the originals — every one is linked.

The morning case file

London Crime Briefing

Significant incidents, hearings, outcomes and public-data changes across the capital.

Akhtar Uddin inquest finds HMP Wandsworth failed | London Crime News