Trending
Case fileCrime DataHillingdon

Hillingdon Councillor Alleges Racist AI Images Used by Conservatives

Labour's Sital Punja claims AI-generated caricatures perpetuate harmful stereotypes and calls for new protections.

Reporting desk London Crime News Desk||4 min read|London Crime News
Hillingdon London Borough CouncilIncident → evidence → outcome
Hillingdon London Borough CouncilRichard Kelly via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 4.0)

Hillingdon Labour councillor Sital Punja has alleged that Hillingdon Conservatives, including Deputy Council Leader Richard Mills, have used artificial intelligence to create and disseminate manipulated images of her without her permission. Councillor Punja, who is of Indian descent, stated that one particular AI-generated caricature depicts her as a puppeteer controlling White men, which she believes perpetuates harmful racist stereotypes.

Allegations of Racist Tropes

The image in question, posted by an anonymous account later identified as belonging to Councillor Mills, shows Councillor Punja with exaggerated features, manipulating White men on puppet strings. Councillor Punja told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that this imagery suggests people are vulnerable when led by a person of colour. She drew parallels to historical tropes used in anti-Semitic propaganda, arguing that such depictions imply an Asian individual in elected office would control White people. Councillor Punja stated that this felt like a violation of her privacy, as she had only consented to official photographs for her civic duties, not for caricature creation for political purposes.

Councillor Punja recounted past experiences of racial abuse during her childhood, highlighting a perceived lack of understanding and moral compass from those involved. She stated that she believes Councillor Mills is unfit for public office due to these actions. She has reported the images to the council’s Standards Committee.

Conservative Group's Response

The Hillingdon Conservative Group has strongly refuted the allegations of racism and sexism. A spokesperson for the group described the images as 'political satire' intended to comment on Councillor Punja's political influence and former standing within the Hillingdon Labour Group. They stated that there was no reference to her race, sex, or religion and that the accusation of racism was a dangerously false claim. The group asserted that political satire and caricature have a legitimate place in political debate. They also mentioned that Hillingdon Labour members have themselves used AI-manipulated photos of Conservative councillors.

Councillor Mills stated that he completely rejects the allegations in the strongest possible terms, calling the image 'political satire' and denying any racist connotations. He added that he would cooperate with any proper process but would not conduct the matter through the media.

Call for New Regulations

Councillor Punja is advocating for new rules to protect elected officials from AI image manipulation. Her call comes amid growing concerns about the use of AI systems to generate images of individuals without consent. In February, the Information Commissioner's Office, alongside international counterparts, issued a statement expressing serious concerns about AI systems that create realistic images and videos of identifiable individuals without their knowledge or permission. Academics have also noted the difficulty in removing specific data points from AI learning models once images are uploaded.

Councillor Punja is also seeking internal discipline for Councillor Richard Mills, whose father, Councillor Douglas Mills, serves as Chief Whip.

Reader briefing

Questions this report answers

Q/A
01What does Councillor Sital Punja allege the Hillingdon Conservatives did?

Councillor Punja alleges that the Hillingdon Conservative Group, including Deputy Council Leader Richard Mills, used artificial intelligence to create and post manipulated images of her without her consent. She claims one image perpetuates racist tropes by depicting her as a puppeteer.

02How did the Hillingdon Conservative Group respond to the allegations?

The Hillingdon Conservative Group rejected the allegations of racism and sexism, describing the images as 'political satire' related to Councillor Punja's political influence. They denied any intent to be racist or sexist and suggested that similar AI-manipulated photos have been posted by local Labour groups.

03What action is Councillor Punja calling for?

Councillor Punja is calling for new rules and regulations to protect elected officials from AI image manipulation. She has also reported the images to the council’s Standards Committee and is seeking internal discipline for Councillor Richard Mills.

LC
Source-led case desk

London Crime News Desk

Source-led, editor-supervised

See the reporting protocol →
Help after crime

Support is available without a police report

Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.

Find victim support
Secure the detail

Send a correction or case update

If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.

Contact the desk

Continue the investigation

Who else reported this

Our article above is written from the facts in these reports. Read the originals — every one is linked.

The morning case file

London Crime Briefing

Significant incidents, hearings, outcomes and public-data changes across the capital.

Sital Punja alleges racist AI images | London Crime News