Trending
Case fileCommunity SafetyHillingdon

Hillingdon Council pays £500 after two-year foster mum rejection

Local Government Ombudsman finds multiple failures in process that left applicant 'strung along'.

Reporting desk London Crime News Desk||3 min read|London Crime News
London Borough of Hillingdon, M4 Motorway - geograph.org.uk - 5726484Incident → evidence → outcome
London Borough of Hillingdon, M4 Motorway - geograph.org.uk - 5726484Lewis Clarke via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Hillingdon Council rejected a prospective foster mother's application after a process lasting over two years, a decision that has now been found to be flawed by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman. The council has since accepted the Ombudsman's findings and made a £500 payment to the applicant.

Delays and communication failures

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman identified multiple instances of fault by Hillingdon Council. These included poor communication, long-term delays attributed to internal restructuring, contradictory explanations during the complaints process, and a failure to direct the applicant to independent oversight. The Ombudsman concluded that the council failed to identify and communicate property suitability issues from the outset.

The applicant, referred to as Miss X, had her home visited by a council officer in May 2023. An officer noted her two-bedroom property had been converted into four rooms to accommodate fostering. Two months later, the council invited her to apply and progressed her application to Stage 2. However, between September 2023 and February 2025, minimal progress was made. A medical assessment, completed in March 2025, was found to be over a year old by the time the application was reviewed by a panel, due to the council's delays.

Property suitability concerns

The council's final rejection in March 2025 cited concerns about limited communal areas due to the property's amended layout, the presence of mould, and the condition of the garden. Miss X stated that her housing officer had previously visited and confirmed the property's suitability, and that these specific concerns had not been raised earlier in the process. The Ombudsman noted that the council was aware of the property's layout and available space from the initial visit in June 2023.

The Ombudsman stated that had the council been transparent from the start, Miss X could have explored alternative options, such as contacting an independent fostering agency. The council's actions raised her expectations and delayed her approach to other agencies, causing her distress, frustration, and uncertainty over an extended period. The Ombudsman ruled that the delay in presenting the assessment to the panel and the failure to identify and communicate property suitability issues were faults.

Council response

Hillingdon Council stated: "We accept the decision of the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman and have met all the agreed actions in its report. We have apologised to the complainant and reviewed our internal processes to ensure we best serve residents and meet their needs." The council made a £500 payment to acknowledge the distress and wasted time experienced by the applicant.

What happens next

Hillingdon Council has accepted the Ombudsman's decision and has stated it has reviewed its internal processes. The £500 payment has been made to the applicant.

Reader briefing

Questions this report answers

Q/A
01Why was the prospective foster mother rejected by Hillingdon Council?

Hillingdon Council rejected the applicant after a two-year process, citing concerns about limited communal areas, mould, and the garden's condition. However, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman found these issues should have been identified and communicated much earlier.

02What faults did the Ombudsman find with the council's process?

The Ombudsman identified multiple faults, including significant delays due to internal restructuring, poor communication, contradictory explanations, and a failure to identify and communicate property suitability issues from the outset of the application.

03What has Hillingdon Council done in response to the Ombudsman's decision?

Hillingdon Council has accepted the Ombudsman's decision, apologised to the applicant, and made a £500 payment to recognise the distress and wasted time. The council also stated it has reviewed its internal processes.

LC
Source-led case desk

London Crime News Desk

Source-led, editor-supervised

See the reporting protocol →
Help after crime

Support is available without a police report

Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.

Find victim support
Secure the detail

Send a correction or case update

If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.

Contact the desk

Continue the investigation

Who else reported this

Our article above is written from the facts in these reports. Read the originals — every one is linked.

The morning case file

London Crime Briefing

Significant incidents, hearings, outcomes and public-data changes across the capital.

Hillingdon Council pays £500 over flawed foster application | London Crime News