Student cleared of supporting Hamas at London rally
Sarah Cotte was acquitted of two charges after a week-long retrial at the Old Bailey.
Incident → evidence → outcomeSarah Cotte, 22, has been cleared of expressing support for Hamas during a speech at a student rally. The Old Bailey jury returned a not guilty verdict on Friday after deliberating for less than two hours. Cotte, from Camden, was also acquitted of a second charge related to a comment made in a WhatsApp group.
The charges
The prosecution had alleged that Cotte's speech on October 9 2023, outside the School of Oriental and African Studies (Soas), which was later publicised on Instagram, contained "thinly veiled references" to Hamas. Cotte denied this, stating she was supporting "the right to resist" and had offered "unconditional solidarity" with Palestinian armed resistance. The court heard that the speech occurred two days after an attack on Israel from the Gaza strip.
During the speech, which was filmed and delivered using a megaphone to an estimated 60 to 70 people, Cotte stated that Palestinians had "broken free" and were rising "against the Zionist state which has been bleeding Palestine dry for nearly 80 years." Chants of "Intifada revolution" followed the address. Cotte was arrested on January 31 2024.
WhatsApp comment
The second charge related to a comment Cotte made on October 16 2023, within a WhatsApp group for the Fight Racism Fight Imperialism (FRFI) society. Cotte was part of a discussion about left-wing commentator Owen Jones when she wrote: "The only way for innocent people to stop dying is for the Palestinian Resistance to be victorious." She had previously been found not guilty of this charge at an earlier trial.
Defence and verdict
Giving evidence, Cotte, who was a 19-year-old student at Soas at the time of the speech, denied supporting Hamas. She told jurors that while she thought the deaths of civilians on October 7 "could be justified," she did not support Hamas and had never done so. She stated she was supporting the right to resist and did not believe it was her role to impose conditions on the Palestinian people's struggle. Cotte claimed that fellow Soas students would understand her references to Palestinian armed resistance did not specifically mean Hamas, though she acknowledged she did not know everyone at the rally.
The jury deliberated for less than two hours before reaching its not guilty verdict on both charges. Pro-Palestine activists had staged protests outside the Old Bailey during both Cotte's first trial and the subsequent retrial.
Questions this report answers
01What was Sarah Cotte accused of?
Sarah Cotte was accused of expressing support for Hamas during a speech outside the School of Oriental and African Studies (Soas) in London on October 9 2023. She also faced a second charge related to a comment made in a WhatsApp group.
02What was Sarah Cotte's defence?
Cotte denied supporting Hamas, stating she was advocating for 'the right to resist' and offering solidarity with Palestinian armed resistance. She told the court she did not believe it was her role to impose conditions on the Palestinian struggle.
03What was the outcome of the trial?
A jury at the Old Bailey found Sarah Cotte not guilty of both charges after deliberating for less than two hours. She had been facing a retrial for the speech charge and was also cleared of a separate WhatsApp group comment charge.
Support is available without a police report
Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.
Find victim supportSend a correction or case update
If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.
Contact the desk