Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor search warrants ruled unlawful
High Court judge to give judgment in open court after agreement between former Duke of York and Thames Valley Police.
Search warrants that permitted officers to raid two of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's homes earlier this year have been declared unlawful. This agreement was reached between the former Duke of York and Thames Valley Police, as stated by a High Court judge. The warrants had allowed police to search properties on the Sandringham Estate and Royal Lodge in February.
Legal Challenge Over Warrants
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor had brought legal proceedings against Thames Valley Police regarding the validity of the search warrants. These warrants were issued by a judge at the Old Bailey. The former Duke of York was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office. This followed allegations that he had shared sensitive information with Jeffrey Epstein during his tenure as the UK’s trade envoy. He was interviewed under caution and subsequently released under investigation. He denies any wrongdoing.
The hearing, presided over by Mr Justice Hilliard, commenced at 2pm. It was held in private, excluding the press and public, with a judgment anticipated to be delivered in open court. It remains unclear whether Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor attended the hearing, and specific details of his legal challenge have not been confirmed.
Misconduct in Public Office
The legal definition of misconduct in a public office encompasses a broad spectrum of behaviour. This can include the disclosure of confidential financial information, financial impropriety, wilful dereliction of duty, and sexual misconduct. It also covers corruption, improper interference, conflicts of interest, perverting the course of justice, dishonesty or fraudulent conduct, and misconduct resulting in personal gain. Police initiated their searches of the two properties and arrested Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor on February 19, his 66th birthday. Thames Valley Police confirmed on February 24 that their searches had concluded.
Next Steps
A High Court judge is expected to give a judgment in open court. Sean Caulfield, a partner at law firm Hodge Jones and Allen, indicated that if successful, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could potentially receive compensation. He also noted that the legal costs would have already amounted to tens of thousands of pounds.
Questions this report answers
01Why were the search warrants for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's homes ruled unlawful?
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Thames Valley Police agreed that the search warrants were unlawful. The warrants allowed officers to raid properties on the Sandringham Estate and Royal Lodge in February. This agreement was stated by a High Court judge.
02What was Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested for?
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office. This followed allegations that he had shared sensitive information with Jeffrey Epstein during his time as the UK’s trade envoy.
03What happens next in this case?
A High Court judge is expected to deliver a judgment in open court regarding the lawfulness of the search warrants. It is also suggested that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could receive compensation if his legal challenge is successful.
Support is available without a police report
Find London services, specialist support and the rights set out in the Victims’ Code. If someone is in immediate danger, call 999.
Find victim supportSend a correction or case update
If a hearing, charge or outcome has changed, send the court, case number and source document so we can update the record.
Contact the deskContinue the investigation
CourtsPelicot Trial play to feature Gisele Pelicot case accounts at London County Hall
CourtsSir Mark Warby sworn in as President of King's Bench Division